AI

AI Looks Seamless. Behind the Scenes, It’s a Mess

By James Corbett, Chief Technology Officer of Pangea

From chatbots to trading bots, today’s AI systems appear clean, polished, and effortless. But under the hood, they’re a patchwork of brittle data feeds, custom integrations, and barely-working infrastructure. 

It’s not the models themselves that are holding AI back, it’s the messy foundation everything else depends on. 

Shoddy AI Infrastructure Is Limiting Innovation 

Every AI product, whether it’s a simple recommender or a multi-agent system, depends on an enormous volume of structured, real-time data. And that data is rarely in one place. It’s scattered across APIs, third-party sources, internal systems, and unstructured logs. 

Getting that data into usable shape isn’t trivial. Teams spend weeks or months writing glue code to stitch together sources, normalize formats, embeddings and manage constantly changing endpoints. Much of this work is redundant, with every team solving the same problems slightly differently. 

In many cases, the pipelines are unreliable by design. One stale endpoint, one malformed payload, and the whole system goes sideways. These problems are hard to monitor and even harder to debug. AI might be intelligent, but its inputs are rarely clean. 

When foundational infrastructure is weak, everything on top becomes fragile. Developers spend more time firefighting than shipping. Features get delayed, test coverage drops, and models are trained on incomplete or inconsistent inputs. 

This wasted effort is a massive drag on innovation. Resources that could be going to product improvements, model optimization, or agent autonomy are instead spent reinventing basic infrastructure that should be standardized and scalable. 

Building Smarter AI Starts with Smarter Infrastructure 

AI is facing the same growing pains that Web2 endured in the early 2000s. At the time, companies had to manage their own servers, configure databases by hand, and build custom scaling logic. Real velocity only came when cloud platforms like AWS and Heroku abstracted those burdens away. 

Today’s AI companies are in a similar position: they lack an AWS-equivalent for data. There’s no standardized infrastructure layer for ingesting, validating, and integrating real-time inputs across domains. As models become more complex and more dependent on live, heterogeneous data streams, the technical overhead on developers will only get worse. 

Developers need unified, reliable ways to query, verify, and stream data. They need observability built in from day one. And they need coordination systems that treat access, uptime, and scalability as table stakes, not as problems to patch downstream. 

This infrastructure should be modular, elastic, and composable, designed to adapt to shifting inputs and usage patterns, just as cloud services do. Most importantly, it should reduce the number of decisions developers have to make about how to find and handle data, so they can focus on building applications, not plumbing. 

Some of that will come from within the AI space. But there’s also a growing case for decentralized systems. Blockchains, despite their limitations, offer a powerful blueprint for how data can be made accessible, verifiable, and tamper-resistant without relying on a single provider. The future may lie in a hybrid model: AI agents running on top of decentralized data coordination layers that combine the openness of Web3 with the performance guarantees of cloud-native infrastructure. 

Fix the Foundation or Stall Out 

AI innovation won’t stall because we hit a model wall. It’ll stall because the foundation underneath is too brittle to scale. If every new product or agent requires rebuilding the stack from scratch, we’ll end up with a graveyard of demos and a handful of heavily resourced players who can afford to brute-force their way past the pain. 

That’s not the future we should settle for.  

Author

Related Articles

Back to top button