By the time we walk into 2026, the question is no longer whether your company is working with AI (spoiler: it is!). The real question is if it is doing so coherently. What separates tech-first organisations now isn’t adoption but alignment: do your people know how to use it together, toward shared outcomes? The businesses that struggle next year will not be the ones without AI. They will be the ones without coherence in its deployment.
This is the emerging AI fragmentation crisis.
Teams sit at very different points between AI readiness and true AI fluency, often using the same words to mean very different things. Hiring is where this confusion surfaces, as managers struggle to judge proficiency in a technology that has moved from novelty to infrastructure in such a short time.
Why Hiring Is Where the Cracks Appear First
When systems fragment, hiring is often the first place it becomes visible. That’s because it absorbs every external signal before the rest of the organisation does.
Over the past two years, application volumes have surged. At the same time, trust in traditional hiring signals has quietly collapsed. CVs and cover letters are now almost universally GenAI polished, making written fluency, once a useful proxy for capability or motivation, become near-universal. Hiring processes were built for a world where credible signals were hard to manufacture. In an era of abundant, synthetic information, which can be styled to perfection in seconds, those assumptions no longer hold.
For recruiters, this creates an impossible dilemma. More candidates than ever appear “qualified” on paper, yet few feel truly right for the role. And this is where hiring teams must make a clear choice as we prepare for the future of work – what action to take as signals weaken. One direction is to fall back on familiarity – recognisable brands, familiar backgrounds, credentials that feel safe. However, even though this move may feel efficient, it increases hiring bias. There is a better way – evaluating what people can genuinely do and shifting the basis of decisions away from surface signals and toward demonstrable skills and capabilities.
Looking Ahead to 2026: The Shape of Talent Is Changing
As we look toward 2026, three shifts are becoming increasingly hard to ignore. Together, they explain why hiring needs to change and in which direction.
Dual Fluency Becomes the Baseline
AI fluency will no longer be a specialist skill. It will be a baseline expectation across all roles. This does not mean everyone needs to build models or sophisticated automations. It means people need the technical literacy to work with AI tools intelligently, combined with the human skills to apply judgement, context, and restraint. Learning agility, systems thinking, and problem-solving matter more as AI increases leverage, because understanding what “good” looks like has never been more important.
This is where a useful distinction emerges. AI readiness is static: a course completed, a tool rolled out, a policy published. AI fluency is adaptive in an evolving technological context: it is the ability to reason with AI outputs, question them, and understand their ripple effects across systems.
In 2026, the question hiring managers will look to explore with their candidates will not be: “Do you use AI?” It will be: “Can you use it well, coherently, and can you adapt as it changes?”
The “Barbell Effect” Sharpens
This demand for dual-fluent talent is accelerating a trend economists have flagged for years: the barbell effect in hiring.
As AI automates routine cognitive work like administration, basic analysis, reporting and similar sets, the middle of the skills market continues to hollow out. At the same time, demand grows toward high-skill, high-autonomy roles. This is not a distant scenario – it is already visible in hiring patterns and policy. In the UK, for example, higher Skilled Worker visa thresholds are effectively pricing mid-level sponsorship out of reach. Companies are responding by focusing almost entirely on senior roles, while mid-skill gaps go unfilled.
The result is fewer hires, higher expectations, and far less tolerance for mismatches. In this environment, the cost of getting hiring wrong is simply too high. HR teams will lean towards additional support, from personality tests to skills-based tests and other additional tricks in the book to lean beyond the traditional CV signals and ensure they’ve made the right call.
From AI-Readiness to Skills and AI-Fluency
This is where skills-based evaluation becomes essential, particularly for AI fluency. It cannot be inferred reliably from job titles or self-reported experience especially for a technology which is this young. It has to be demonstrated through practical experience.
Can a candidate interpret AI-generated output critically? Can they recognise when it is wrong, incomplete, or misaligned with context? Can they combine machine assistance with human judgement to reach better outcomes? Do they understand what a good output looks like, while maintaining ethical use?
The shift towards identifying and assessing such talent is in the right direction – AI skills tests are considered to be the fastest rising globally, having increased 166% in 2025. This isn’t a temporary spike. In the US, the demand for AI fluency has jumped nearly sevenfold over the past two years and now applies to occupations employing about seven million workers, illustrating how rapidly employers are moving beyond basic AI knowledge toward expecting deeper, practical fluency.
These are practical considerations that will increasingly determine who succeeds in high-impact roles. 2026 will witness a surge in demand for AI augmentation in all roles, but particularly those in commercial (sales, marketing, Go-to-Market strategy), customer success and product management.
What This Means for the Future of HR
The AI fragmentation crisis can be solved by better aligning technology, skills, and decision-making. Hiring, HR and adjacent teams sit at the centre of this challenge.
Hiring is where fragmentation becomes visible, but it is also where we can start building coherence. HR teams own the systems through which people enter, move through, and shape organisations. If leaders are willing to interrogate what they are truly optimising for, recruitment should be the first port of call.
One of the quiet risks ahead is confusing confidence with competence. In a world of AI-polished applications, AI-augmented conversations and fluent self-presentation, it becomes dangerously easy to reward people who sound convincing rather than those who can reason, adapt, and make good decisions under pressure. When that happens, fragmentation compounds: teams talk past one another, tools are misused, and accountability blurs.
In 2026, the most important question for HR won’t be speed. It will be judgement: what companies consistently hire for and promote. Skills-first hiring helps because it tests what matters – how people think, learn and decide – and gives teams a common benchmark for AI-era capability.
