Future of AIAI

What It Really Takes to Build an AI Company of the Future

By Ryan Debenham, CEO, GRIN

Your AI product will fail.ย ย 

Thatโ€™sย a sobering statement. Butย itโ€™sย theย reality for most companies.ย 

Only 5% of custom enterprise AI tools reach the production stage,ย according to MIT research.ย 

Theย reason whyย is simple: Companiesย donโ€™tย knowย howย to build AI software and may not fully appreciate the internal work required for their businesses to embrace AI from the top down.ย 

What makes it so hard for companies to embrace AI fully? Here are three main culprits:ย 

  1. The growingย disconnectย between executivesโ€™ expectations and employeesโ€™ reality: Too often, executives announce vague plans to become AI-native without considering how it will work orย impactย their employees, many of whom are already dealing with frustrated customers, overloaded ticket queues, production bugs, etc. Adding an AI overhaul to employeesโ€™ already-full plates only results in being spread too thin and faster burnout.

  2. Employees fear AI: Many teams are still resistant toย the technologyย because they think it will replace them. In fact,ย 71% of Americans are concerned that AIย will put swaths of people out of work permanently. While this fear is understandable, continuing to resist AI whenย itโ€™sย here to stay will only accelerate the processย of itย replacing you. But itย wonโ€™tย be AI itself that takes your job โ€”ย itโ€™llย be the workers who know how to use it.

  3. Executives underestimate the changes true AI adoption and implementation require:ย  Productย strategy has to change. Companies must carefullyย establishย expectations related to user interfaces and user experiences for AI.ย Some executives donโ€™t take this seriously, thinking itโ€™s enough to add AI to legacy systems and assuming that it is less risky than building a product from scratch.ย However, legacy systems were carefully designed based on structured frameworks, inputs,ย outputsย and algorithms that make them work as intended. AI is fundamentally different โ€”ย itโ€™sย less concrete and can change overnight with a model update. If you try to bolt AI onto your legacy systems, you risk falling behind in the AI revolution.ย ย 

AI involvesย a paradigm shiftย that requires companies to rethink how they build software, manageย peopleย and set expectations.ย ย 

Hereโ€™sย how to make that shift, alignย expectationsย and help people through the change:ย 

Invest in personal learning before setting mandatesย 

Executives who want their employees to be all-in with AI must ensure they are, too.ย ย 

Itโ€™sย not possible for an executive to effectively lead their company through this AI revolution without getting their hands dirty and learning whatย the technologyย is andย isnโ€™tย good for, while expecting their teams to do so.ย ย 

Take the time and effort to understandย the technology. This might involve watching YouTube videos on how to build an agent or learning how toย codeย with programs like Cursor. By being hands-on, execs can get a handle on AIโ€™s capabilities and set more realistic expectations for their teams.ย 

Guide,ย donโ€™tย just demandย ย 

Employeesย canโ€™tย magically transform their workflows to accommodate AI transformation while also handling day-to-day chaos. Provide them with the direction,ย resourcesย and structure needed to navigate these changes.ย ย ย 

For example, when we decided toย goย AI-native at GRIN, we rolled out licenses for AI coding tools, opened Slack channels for sharing wins, hosted brown-bag sessions and then set a hard adoption boundary. This gave our team the space to dive into AI and share their experiences as we all tried to wrap our heads around this technology. While some people resisted, the clarity allowed the rest of the team to thrive, and productivity hit levelsย weโ€™dย never seen before.ย 

Start fresh with building productsย 

Simply bolting AI features onto a legacy platform may be a quick fix, but it can leave companies vulnerable to startups that are building AI-native products from the ground up.ย Trueย impact comes from takingย a riskย by developing AI-first products.ย ย 

For example, AI customer service company Intercom has opted to develop a parallel AI product in addition to their core product. Intercom’s Fin AI, its customer support agent, has grown into the centerpiece of its offering without disrupting its legacy system prematurely.ย 

Most AI productsย donโ€™tย fail because the technologyย isnโ€™tย ready; they fail because the companies using themย arenโ€™t. AI is not a feature to bolt on;ย itโ€™sย a mindsetย companiesย must build in.ย ย 

Organizations thatย donโ€™tย put in the work to explore the technology, guideย employeesย and reimagine their products will continue to chase hype while falling further behind.ย 

The questionย isnโ€™tย whether AI will change companies. It already is.ย ย 

The question is whether companies will change enough to survive and thrive with AI.ย 

Author

Related Articles

Back to top button