
It wasnโt too long ago that voice assistants like Siri and Alexa felt like a window into the future. Ask a question out loud, and youโd be met with a natural (enough) sounding response. However, these virtual assistants were limited in the kinds of information they could draw from โ who hasnโt been met with โsearch the web?โ when a question has stumped their assistant.
The emergence of generative AI connected many of these gaps, allowing people to pose any question, in any way they wanted, and receive a tailored response they could probe and modify further โ redefining how people access information.
It wasnโt long before technology leaders began to take notice and imagine the possible business use cases โ think connecting an AI chatbot to company data to create an autonomous copilot that could answer business questions in real time. No need for specialised apps, menus or dashboards, just talk to the machine for any business information queries.
That hasnโt been realised, at least not yet.ย Recent researchย found chatbots havenโt had a marked impact on earnings or working hours, and thatโs because business processes need more than just a connected interface – they demand structure, consistency and context. The idea of replacing software with chat, while appealing on the surface, misses the bigger opportunity: embedding AI where peopleโs work actually happens.
Overcoming friction and reactivity
One of the biggest challenges with chat-based AI in enterprise settings is whatโs known as the โblank canvasโ problem. Chatbots are open-ended by design: ask them anything, and they deliver a response. While thatโs part of their appeal for consumers, it becomes a bottleneck for businesses.
Imagine a salesperson juggling multiple customers and prospects. Rather than needing to toggle away from an email client to ask a chatbot about an account, refine the prompts and return once theyโve reviewed the information, a business with AI embedded directly into its tools and systems could surface those insights immediately. In that instance, a chatbot simply adds unnecessary friction.
Too often, chatbots operate outside the systems where employees actually do their work. If a sales leader wants to understand pipeline risk, they might have to bounce between a CRM and a separate chat interface. Ask a question, switch applications, copy, paste, repeat. This doesnโt just slow things down, it increases the risk of error and keeps institutional knowledge siloed across tools.
Thereโs also a fundamental difference between reactive and proactive intelligence. Chatbots wait for input – they only respond when asked. But in the fast-moving world of sales, finance, or customer support, teams canโt afford to wait until someone thinks to ask the right question. They need to know when a deal is at risk, when a forecast is off or when customer sentiment dips, before they even think to ask.
Embedded AI doesnโt wait. It detects issues in real time, surfaces them within the tools employees already use, and recommends next steps. Itโs not just answering questions, itโs steering outcomes.
Consistency is key
Another issue with chat-first interfaces is consistency. If five employees are given the same brief but all query a chatbot for answers, theyโll receive five different responses. One user might prompt a chat interface with highly specific details while another might phrase their questions in a more topline way. This kind of variability doesnโt work in enterprise environments, where teams depend on shared processes and standardised outputs.
AI thatโs woven into business systems helps enforce structure. It ensures that all employees are guided through the same best-practice workflows from directly within the tools like Microsoft Teams theyโre already using. They can come off a call and be given actionable next steps that align with their organisations priorities and policy.
Bringing intelligence directly into workflows is the only answer. When AI is embedded within a sales platform, for example, it can automatically flag issues, suggest next steps and update forecasts in a predictable, consistent way. It doesnโt rely on prompts to be perfect, it just works.
Finally, thereโs a real limitation to relying solely on text-based interfaces. Business decisions often rely on complex, multidimensional data thatโs typically housed in multiple places. A chatbot can summarise the information itโs given, but it canโt offer the interactive experience of a dashboard that surfaces regional data, information about different customers or generate real time predictions.
Business users need more than words, they need insight thatโs easy to digest, relevant to their context and actionable. Knowing whatโs happening is less useful to employees under pressure than being instructed on what they should do next to optimise results.
Prioritising fluidity over fluency
While the novelty of chat interfaces is undeniable, business leaders cannot afford to confuse the medium for the message. While chatbots will no doubt continue to prove popular in consumer applications, the real opportunity in enterprise AI lies in how it can drive better decision making and outcomes, not its linguistic fluency.
When intelligence is embedded in the platforms workers already use, be it CRMs, their companyโs messaging platforms and even other AI copilots, it allows for easier access within their workflows to information they can trust. That means automating mundane tasks like researching potential customers so employees can spend more time meaningfully engaging with them, armed with insights that set them up for success.

