Future of AIAI

AI Ready Databases: The Next Boardroom Imperative

By Ryan McCurdy, Vice President of Marketing, Liquibase

Artificial intelligence has become a boardroom priority. CEOs are pressing for growth and efficiency gains, regulators are issuing new rules, and investors are watching closely. Yet despite rapid advances in model performance, executives continue to ask the same question: can we trust AI enough to run the business on it? 

That answer does not begin with the models themselves. It begins with the data layer. Without databases that are governed, auditable, and resilient, even the best models will deliver outputs that cannot be trusted, explained, or defended. 

Why the Database is Still the Weak Link 

Modern data pipelines draw from transactional systems, warehouses, lakes, and streams. At the core of these systems sits the database, changing every day as columns are added, data types evolve, and indexes shift. When those changes are handled manually or without governance, organizations face broken lineage, silent drift across environments, and inconsistent semantics. 

The scale makes the issue more acute. A large bank may run thousands of databases, many with billions of rows of data. Updating one of these systems can take hours, and if a change must be rolled back, downtime extends even further. Meanwhile, the daily cycle of ingestion and updates continues.  

Even fifteen minutes of downtime can cost millions in lost productivity and transactions. Outages and rollbacks do not just slow delivery, they create drift and corruption, leaving critical records inconsistent or out of date across the enterprise. Models trained on that foundation might look accurate in a notebook but fail once deployed in production. 

The problem is widespread. In a 2025 State of Database DevOps survey conducted by Liquibase, 78 percent of global IT leaders said AI and machine learning workloads are now their top database challenge. McKinsey’s 2024 State of AI report echoes this, finding that 70 percent of enterprises struggle with data governance, integration, and quality when scaling AI. Another survey found that 62 percent of organizations view poor data governance as the single largest obstacle to scaling AI initiatives.  

The Regulatory Wave Has Arrived 

Regulators are moving quickly. The EU AI Act mandates that high-risk AI systems be trained on datasets with clear governance and traceable preparation processes. The NIST AI Risk Management Framework calls on organizations to Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage data across the entire AI lifecycle. 

Sector-specific mandates are equally demanding. DORA, now in effect for financial services, requires resilience and integrity in the data layer. SOX 404 obliges companies to maintain strict internal controls over financial reporting. HIPAA’s Security Rule enforces audit and integrity safeguards for healthcare data. 

The message is clear: explainable models require explainable data, and that starts at the database level. 

What AI Ready Really Means 

Being AI ready is not about buying a new database engine. It is about governing the way existing databases change and evolve. Three principles define the AI ready database: 

  1. Transparent lineage

    Every schema change must carry context: who made it, when, why, and how. That creates a chain of custody for data structures and ensures regulators and auditors can trace model inputs back to their source.
     

  2. Policy enforcement before deployment

    Controls cannot wait until after an incident. Changes should be checked for risk and compliance before they reach production. This reduces errors, prevents drift, and embeds governance directly into delivery pipelines.
     

  3. Resilience across environments and platforms

    Development, staging, and production must remain consistent. Rollback and recovery capabilities must be built in. Governance cannot stop at one platform but must span relational, NoSQL, and cloud-native databases. 

“The next wave of AI winners will not be those with the biggest models, but those with the most trustworthy databases.” 

Why Leaders Should Care 

Schema governance may sound technical, but the business implications are direct. In the 2025 State of Database DevOps survey by Liquibase, nearly half of IT leaders (48 percent) said security and compliance are their top database challenge. More than four in ten (43 percent) reported prioritizing automation to address it, which in practice means governing schema changes with pre-deployment controls, audit trails, and rollback capabilities.  

Organizations that modernize their database practices reduce incidents, speed up delivery, and lower compliance costs. More importantly, they position themselves to meet fast-approaching regulatory expectations with confidence. 

In 2024, McKinsey’s State of AI report noted that data-related challenges are among the top reasons AI programs fail to scale. By contrast, enterprises that embed governance and resilience at the data layer can accelerate trusted AI adoption and differentiate on reliability as much as innovation. 

A Call to Action for Business Leaders 

C suite executives cannot delegate AI readiness to data scientists alone. They must ensure that the underlying database infrastructure meets the standards of reliability, governance, and compliance required by both regulators and customers. That means: 

  • Treating database change as a first class citizen in DevOps and MLOps pipelines. 
  • Investing in automation that enforces policy and blocks drift, rather than relying on manual review. 
  • Aligning data governance strategies with emerging AI mandates so compliance is built in from the start. 

The enterprises that succeed in AI will not be those with the largest datasets or the most advanced models. They will be those that build trust into the foundation of their data layer, ensuring every schema change is consistent, governed, and auditable. 

Conclusion 

AI is shaping the future, but without strong governance at the database layer, that future comes with unacceptable risk. Boards and regulators alike are demanding explainability and resilience, and customers are beginning to expect the same. 

For executives, the takeaway is clear: the next phase of competitive advantage will not be won by building bigger models, but by building more trustworthy data foundations. Enterprises that invest in AI ready databases will not only scale AI faster and safer, they will also demonstrate to investors and VCs that their growth is sustainable, compliant, and defensible. 

The organizations that win the confidence of the market will be those that can prove every schema change is consistent, governed, and auditable, turning AI from a promising pilot into a dependable growth engine. 

Author

Related Articles

Back to top button